Three networks, one creative test, Snapchat from 0.9 to 5.86

Three networks, one creative test, Snapchat from 0.9 to 5.86

Online Sales · Beverage brand

A sparkling herbal drink, sold through the brand’s own online store. It had a large content library and ads on three networks, and none of them could say which content actually sold. Snapchat was spending more than it earned. We rebuilt all three around one testing idea.

5.86return on Snapchat, from about 0.9on 35.7% less spend
1,705orders from Meta at a 4.34 return+116% on the period before
12M+awareness impressions feeding retargeting

The situation

Plenty of content, no idea which of it sold

The account ran a handful of catch-all sales campaigns that had been set up long before. Nothing was set up to compare one network with another, and the brand’s best content was buried among hundreds of clips.

What we did

One test, three networks

  1. Sorted the content library by angle

    Every clip and photo was filed into angles: offer, visual appeal, user-generated, talkative, calm, movement, testimonial and more. Creative became something we could test, not just post.

    Performance Creative
  2. Ran the same four angles everywhere

    Meta, Snapchat and TikTok each got the same four sales angles as separate ad sets, so an angle’s result on one network could be compared with the others.

    MetaSnapchatTikTok
  3. Added a cheap awareness layer

    Profile-visit and awareness campaigns on every network, at a fraction of the sales budget, built the audiences that the retargeting campaigns then sold to.

    Retargeting
  4. Rotated creative in numbered batches

    Offers and user-generated clips ran in numbered sets, so every set could be read on its own and winners stayed easy to spot.

  5. Reported across all three in one place

    A single report showed every network, campaign, angle, age group and weekday side by side.

    CRO & Analytics

The test design

MetaSnapchatTikTokOffertestedtestedtestedVisual appealbest returnbest returntestedUGCtestedtestedtestedTalkativetestedtestedtestedAwareness layer on every network feeds the retargeting pools
MetaSnapchatTikTokOffertestedtestedtestedVisual appealbest returnbest returntestedUGCtestedtestedtestedTalkativetestedtestedtestedAwareness layer on every network feeds the retargeting pools
Same angles, three networks: visual appeal returned the most per dollar on Meta and Snapchat; offer and user-generated content carried the volume.

Results

Snapchat went from losing money to leading

Snapchat, before and after

BeforeFour months laterReturn on ad spendabout 0.95.86Ordersabout 2701,197
BeforeFour months laterReturn on ad spendabout 0.95.86Ordersabout 2701,197
Snapchat sales campaigns over four months against the period before, on 35.7% less sales spend.

Return on ad spend by network

4.34Meta5.86Snapchat3.11TikTok
4.34Meta5.86Snapchat3.11TikTok
Return on ad spend by network over the four months.

Orders by network

1,705Meta1,197Snapchat644TikTok
1,705Meta1,197Snapchat644TikTok
Orders recorded by each network over the four months.

What made the difference

Testing audiences is easy; testing ideas is harder. Running the same creative angles on every network turned three separate accounts into one experiment, and the answer was clear within weeks.

Online Sales at the Structure level runs two to three networks as one plan, exactly like this.

See Online Sales