896 property leads in nine weeks, with one channel

896 property leads in nine weeks, with one channel

Lead Generation · Real-estate developer

A residential developer had two projects to sell, to local buyers and to buyers abroad, in two languages. Google was blocked on day one by a slow tag install on the website side, so Meta had to carry the launch on its own. We turned it into a controlled experiment and let the data choose where the money went.

896leads in nine weeksMeta lead forms into the CRM
86%cheaper leads for one project than the otherfound in the first two weeks
$3.66per lead on the best campaign
13.6%of people who opened a form submitted it

The situation

Two projects, two audiences, two languages, one channel

The client needed a quick, honest read before committing larger budgets: which project, which audience, which platform and which language would produce leads its sales team could actually work. Every lead had to come from someone who could plausibly buy a home.

What we did

A launch built as an experiment

  1. Split everything that could be split

    Campaigns by audience and platform, ad sets by project and language, and eight instant forms, one per project, language and platform, each routed to the CRM. The first budget was split evenly so nothing was decided by guesswork.

    MetaInstant formsCRM routing
  2. Read the data early

    After nine days the ready-to-move-in project and its local-language creative were clearly ahead. Facebook with local buyers was the cheapest; Instagram with buyers abroad the most expensive.

  3. Isolated the weaker project

    The second project got its own campaigns and budget for five days. Its leads cost about $36 against about $4.70 for the lead project, so it was paused and the budget moved.

    Budget reallocation
  4. Let sales feedback decide the audience

    Local audiences were narrowed for quality. Broad automated audiences were tested abroad for volume, then switched off when the sales team reported the leads were weak.

    Lead quality loop

Same channel, same weeks: cost per lead by project

Second projectLead projectCost per leadabout $36about $4.70
Second projectLead projectCost per leadabout $36about $4.70
Five-day isolation test. The weaker project was paused and its budget moved.

Results

Nine weeks, 896 leads

Across the full period the account produced 896 leads at an average of about $7.30 each. Leads from abroad ran about three to four times the local cost, which shaped where the second phase went.

309leads from the best campaign, at about $3.66 each
373leads from a single image ad, the best creative
1M+post engagements from the support campaigns, at a fraction of a cent each

The work

Lifestyle first

Project render at night
Lifestyle renders from the launch creative set
Project render by day
Local-language versions won every test

What made the difference

The ad platform could tell us which leads were cheap. Only the sales team could tell us which were real. Building that feedback into the weekly decisions mattered more than any bid setting.

Property sells by conversation. Lead Generation tests fast, then puts the budget where qualified buyers come from.

See Lead Generation